DIRECT,
PURPOSEFUL EXPERIENCES AND BEYOND
Objectives:
1.
To
identify guidelines should be
consider in the selection and use of the
instructional materials
2.
To distinguish where should these direct purposeful
experience lead the learner for meaningful learning.
ABSTRACTION
Whatever
skills or concept we have did not come out of the blue. We spent hours doing
the activity by ourselves in order to acquire the skill. The same thing is
through with the four (4)narrators
above. They learned the skills by doing. The Graduate School Professor had to do the computer task herself to learn
the skill. The secretary learn from her mistake and repeatedly doing the task
correctly enabled her to master the skill. The Grade IV pupil got a crystal
clear concepts of the size of the elephant and giraffe. For the Grade VI
teacher, the statistical concepts of positive and negative discrimination
indices became fully understood only after the actual experience of item
analysis. All these experiences point to the need to use, whenever we can,
direct, purposeful experiences in the teaching – learning process.
What are referred to as a direct,
purposeful experience? These are our concrete and firsthand experiences that make up the foundation of
our learning. These are the rich experiences
that our senses bring from which we construct the ideas, the concepts,
the generalization that gives meaning and order to our lives. (Dale. 1969).
They are sensory experiences.
These direct activities may be preparing meals , making a piece of furniture, doing power point presentation, performing a laboratory experiment, delivering a speech, or taking a trip.
In
contrast, indirect experiences are experiences of other people that we observe,
read or hear about. They are not our own self – experiences but still
experiences in the sense that we see , read hear about them. They are not
firsthand but rather vicarious or indirect experiences .
Climbing
a mountain is a firsthand, direct experience. Seeing it done on films or
reading about it is vicarious, substitute experience. It is clear, therefore,
that we can approach the world of reality directly through the senses and
indirectly with reduced sensory experience. For example, we can bake black
forest cake or see it done in the tv or read about it.
Why are these direct experiences described
to be purposeful? Purposeful because
the experiences are not purely mechanical.
They are not a matter of going through the motion. These are not “mere
sensory excitation”. They are experiences that are internalized in the sense that these experiences involved
the asking of questions that have significance in the life of the person undergoing
the direct experience.
They
are also described as purposeful because these experiences are undergone in
relation to a purpose, i.e. learning. Why do we want our students to have a
direct experience in conducting an experiment in the laboratory? It is done in
the relation to a certain learning objective.
Where
should these direct , purposeful experience lead us to? The title of this
lesson “direct, Purposeful Experiences and Beyond” implies that these direct
experiences must not be the period or the dead end. We must be brought to a
higher plane. The higher plane referred
to here is the level of generalization and abstraction.
That
is why we speak of “hands – on, minds – on, and hearts – on” approach. Out of
the direct experience , thoughts or meanings following reflection must flow or
run the risk of a lesson consisting of
activity after another activity enjoyed by the learners who cannot make
connection with the activity themselves.
The
Grade IV pupils zoo experience of the elephant
and giraffe as given in the ACTIVITY phase of the lesson enables him to
understand clearly and visualize correctly an elephant and a giraffe upon
reading or hearing the words “elephant” and “giraffe”. The Cone of experience implies that we move from
the concrete to the abstract (and from the abstract to the concrete as
well.) Direct experiences serves as the
foundation of concepts formation, generalization and abstraction. John Dewey
(1916) has made this fundamental point succinctly.
An ounce of experience is better a ton of
theory because it is only in experience that any theory has vital and
verifiable significance. An experience, a very humble experience, is capable of
generating and carrying any amount of theory (or intellectual content), but a theory apart from an experience cannot
be definitely grasped as a theory. It tends to become a mere verbal formula, a
set of catchwords used to render
thinking or genuine theorizing unnecessary and impossible.
If
direct, purposeful experiences or firsthand sensory experiences make us learn
concepts and skills.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento